Purpose
Wanting to implement a sustainable learner coaching program in academic medicine and prior exposure to coaching initiatives raised questions, including planning, implementation and assessment, and resource allocation. This scoping review examines coaching across medical learners, reported program elements, success factors, and barriers.
Methods
Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, which were informed by Levac et al. on Arksey and O’Malley’s framework and Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC were searched through May 2024. Articles were screened, the data were extracted and coded. The mixed methods analysis included descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Themes/domains were developed and refined through consensus.
Results
Of 801 articles screened, 141 were included in the analysis. Coaching publications in academic medicine have increased, peaking in 2023 (n = 20). Most articles focused on competency-based coaching (n = 91), followed by learner wellness (n = 26). Coaching was more frequently studied in GME (n = 92), with overlaps in UME (n = 64) and faculty (n = 43). Six domains emerged: overview/general, coaching program related, coaching process related, coaching outcomes, coaching success factors, and coaching barriers. The articles reflected a broad conceptualization of coaching in academic medicine. Coaching programs varied in structure but commonly aimed to support competency, wellness, interpersonal skills, and self-directed learning. Reporting on coach recruitment, training, and compensation was inconsistent. Coaching processes incorporated reflection, goal setting, and observation. The coaching outcomes encompassed skills development and personal and professional growth. Success factors included institutional support and coach training; barriers involved time constraints, role ambiguity, and coachee readiness.
Conclusions
Coaching is increasingly used in academic medicine to address diverse and evolving learner needs across settings, within the United States and internationally. This review reveals the conceptual breadth and structural variability of coaching programs and the flexibility of coaching as a practice for individualizing learner success. The findings offer insights and serve as a resource for institutions seeking to develop, implement, or refine coaching initiatives.