Abstract Review

Feasibility and acceptability of an everyday patient-centered discussion model for primary care: An exploratory, single-center study in the VA primary care setting.

DOI10.1016/j.pecinn.2026.100486
AuthorsSchulenberg FB, Dorin SS, Elsiss F, Rager JB, Sussman JB, Hayward RA, Dussán KB, Caverly TJ.
JournalMED
SourceExternal record

Objectives

Primary care visits average 15 min or less, limiting physician time for engaging in detailed shared decision-making. The ZIP approach-Zeroing in on Individualized, Patient-Centered Decisions-offers a practical path to improving decisions within time constraints. This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of the ZIP approach in facilitating patient-centered decision-making for lung cancer screening (LCS) and blood pressure (BP) management in primary care.

Methods

Multiple-methods study using audio-recorded primary care appointments and patient and physician feedback from surveys and semi-structured interviews. 23 patients who were eligible for an initial LCS (n = 4) or BP medication intensification (n = 19) and 10 primary care physicians were enrolled in a single center study in a VA medical center. Feasibility was assessed through observing duration (in minutes) for initial ZIP presentation, total conversation, completion of ZIP components, and patient-survey-based SDM measure (SDM-Q-9). Acceptability was assessed through conducting thematic analysis of patient and physician interviews.

Results

ZIP discussions took less than 4 min. The median time for the initial ZIP presentation was 1.8 min (IQR) for LCS and 2 min (IQR) for BP conversations. Almost half of the encounters (43%; n = 9/21) had perfect ZIP fidelity scores (median = 9/10); The mean SDM-Q-9 score, reflecting patients‘ perceptions of the extent of SDM during the appointment, was 90.9 out of 100. Patients reported valuing personalized communication, trust, and collaborative decision-making. Physicians perceived that the SDM discussions were shorter, appreciated the tailored information and data visualizations, but suggested improvements to better align ZIP with conversational flow.

Conclusions

The ZIP approach is a promising method for facilitating brief, patient-centered discussions in primary care. Its high acceptability among patients and physicians suggests strong potential for improving decision quality across diverse preventive care topics.

Innovation

ZIP introduces a novel framework for integrating shared decision-making into routine care by addressing longstanding implementation barriers. Future research should examine scalability across diverse settings and evaluate sustainable approaches to integrate ZIP guidance into primary care.